Block training

I have come across this term a while ago but somehow did not manage to get more detailed texts on this subject. Recently though someone mentioned that block periodization will be covered in Pavel’s new book on kettlebells. I asked what it is on the Igx, and Kev posted a video to the lecture by Prof. Issurin, where he gives a little introduction of this topic (more of a tease actually).

After a bit of searching I have an idea of what block training is. This post is a brief summary of it.
Block training is an alternative to the traditional periodization. Why do we need an alternative? There are several reasons, the main one being that as the athlete progresses to the serious level, the volume and intensity of his/her training becomes unacceptably high. According to Verhoshansky, this increase in volume sometimes becomes the end point of training. As the time available for training is limited it is clear that other ways of growth should be devised.

Verhoshansky believes that this problem is in turn the result of the traditional system of training, which he coins as complex-parallel. It implies simultaneous development of various qualities in an athlete: strength, endurance, speeds and so on. The principle in the USSR was: “If you want to beat your opponent, you have to train more than him”. From what I read in the Western publications, this principle is probably used throughout the entire world.

Partly this approach is correct. In order to progress athletes of very high qualifications need serious training stimuli. The problem is that at intensities and volumes of training required for this progress specificity of training is reduced and sport-specific training turns into sophisticated GPP workout. The athlete progresses, but not in the most efficient or safest way.

In order to better understand the principles of block training, let’s consider the example from Verhoshansky’s article. It concerns preparation of middle distance runners – the discipline in my opinion quite close to girevoy sport.

Training is done by alternating three training blocks: A, B and C.

Block A consists of specialized training that has as its goal the development of muscular strength and its variations: absolute, explosive, reactive, local muscular endurance etc.

Block B uses various methods of gradually increasing intensity, such as repetitive, intermittent, interval, serial, control and other methods, in order to develop energetic potential of the body.

Block C – participation in competition or its imitation, tactical training, modeling of competitive programs etc.

Practically, applied to middle distance runners this training will look like this.

The goal of Block A – increase of aerobic capacity. This is done by using local intensification of muscular work: exercises with weights, jumps, as well as special regimes of distance work, with increased strength component and at slow tempo, such as running uphill. Verhoshansky stresses that the goal of this block is increasing intensity in order to develop local muscular endurance.

Distance work in this block is performed in the aerobic zone, below anaerobic threshold. That in creases aerobic capacity and prepares the athlete for prolonged running at optimal, constantly increasing speed.

Block B. Specifically directed increase in power and work capacity by increasing the intensity of distance work. That achieves the following.
Increase in anaerobic capacity
Perfection of the running technique
Improving of running technique at high (highest) speed
Development of the ability to maintain speed of running at submaximal level while keeping the technique adequate.
Increase of the stride length
Synchronization of breathing with running in the state of increasing fatigue.

Block C. Final phase in the cycle. The goal – increase of power and capacity of the energy potential of the body by maximally increasing intensity of distance work while decreasing its total volume, longer running at higher heart rate.
The most important criterion of mastery in block C is the ability of the athlete to effectively spend energy during competitive running. The winning athlete is the one who, at the same speed of running, spend less energy.

Expressed graphically the progress of the athlete over three blocks looks like this.


w – athlete’s power
i – intensity of training
p – volume of training
f – athlete’s functional state

(From Verhoshansky, Theory and methodology of sports training: block system of training of athletes of high qualification.)

The idea of block training is quite simple. Instead of simultaneously training all qualities necessary for a specific sport you do it in blocks, addressing each one in a concentrated way: strength, then speed, then endurance etc. In this way the functional systems of the body are taxed during different periods, allowing for better recovery. This way of training is primarily advocated for high class athletes, when traditional training becomes impractical. On the other hand, it should be quite useful for older athletes, in whom the ability to recover is decreased and in whom time limit is a factor.

To add the oil to the debate, I find the logic of the middle distance running template above very applicable to girevoy sport. Don’t you think it can be translated to GS?

Block A – volume training, lots of reps at low to moderate intensity. As you remember, intensity in GS is measured by the weight of the bells and the number of repetitions in a set (which is more or less equals the duration). Rest intervals between sets would be liberal, allowing for adequate recovery. Supplementary strength training with a barbell and jogging.

During block B you would work on increasing the intensity by introducing repetitive and interval work as well as occasional control sets. Rests are shorter, speed higher. Total volume stays the same. Running at higher speed and intervals.

Block C – OTW paradise. The volume goes down and the intensity up. Long timed sets with the emphasis on increasing the duration. Speed here is secondary, making sure the technique stays clean. No supplemental work except for specific assistance exercises.

After completing the cycle – back to block A. You can either increase the weight of the bells by couple of kilos or stay at the same weight and increase the volume.

What’s nice about this way of training is that it brings variety and makes working out more interesting. Also, because training stimuli change relatively often it keeps the body from adapting and hitting a plateau.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hello Eugene,
Thankyou for the great blog - although 'only' in my 30s I'm looking to apply some of the outlined principles in my training. As a novice to g.s. I am just wondering what sort of length each block would be i.e. should I spend 8 weeks on block A., 4 weeks on B. and 3 weeks on C.? As I am a rank beginner i.e. 2*16kg and my focus is on health first, performance second, I also include lots of body weight exercises (ala Steve Maxwell) which focus on movements outside of the sagittal (g.s. dominant)planes aswell as lots of yoga as my foundation, how does one periodise each week under the aforementioned block system?
Does the following seem to be reasonable:
Mon heavy jerks
Tue: Squats etc
Wed: skip/run/swim light jerks + juggling
Thr:heavy snatch day
Fri:Deadlift etc
Sat:skip/run/swim light snatch day+juggling
Sun: easy swim lots of stretching/traction/massage etc.

Any thoughts from the more experienced practioners recommended.

Thanks again,

Alex

Anonymous said...

Eugene,
Very interesting to me as this is exactly the model I chose to guide my training after copious reading of the literature in strength training, running, rowing, and periodization.

It will be interesting after the Arnold Classic next month when I go back to Block A to see how my squats and quick lifts 1RM have fared after several months of my heaviest lifts being 32kg bells. I believe for my next build phase I will continue to lift heavier weights but only perhaps once a week. There are pundits who would suggest that 1-2 sessions a week of heavy lifting is plenty for the senior athlete and practice what they teach.

Although I'm not able to articulate this thought very well, I do think that the analogy of GS to running/rowing, etc. breaks down at some point given the stress imposed by the resistance of the giri. Again a point particularly relevant to the older lifter. I've not found the Unifying Theory (tm), but have tried to use a little common sense in identifying looking, feeling, and acting wiped out as approaching Selye's exhaustion phase and back off for at least a day or two. So far so good :)

Alex,

Your suggested work out program looks like a great Block A scheme. I would keep a close eye on the status of the low back given that you are devoting a day to "deadlift, etc" and there is actually a lot of lower back work going on in the rest of your program. Good luck and let us know how it turns out for you.

David

Anonymous said...

Sorry, actually I did have another thought and that concerns the applicability of the extent of "conversion" activities typically performed by athletes in which speed is paramount in Block B to GS. This hinges on a question I have regarding the optimal explosivity in GS movements. I'm thinking of the spectrum of 10 minute activity from opening "here we go" to the attempt to squeeze as many reps as possible in the last 30 seconds. Bottom line is that I don't think we want to regularly utilize our maximum potential for explosive lifting as we would for an Olympic J or Sna, the obvious reason being quicker onset of exhaustion. Yes, probably good to do plyometrics, and anaerobic short intervals, but not as many as say a middle distance runner would use. The art of GS training would seem to be to develop just sufficient force and speed skills to get the job done and use the least amount of energy in each repetition as possible - until to simply get another rep demands huge investment in power and kinesics (deeper second dip, etc).

Maybe to that extent, we are more like marathon canoeists or runners than middle distance guys?

Anonymous said...

Thanks for the suggestions girevikdavid, may I just ask your thoughts on heavy and lights days i.e. how many sets/reps/time of jerks or snatches would be appropriate for a 'heavy' and 'light' day? At the moment I only have 2 16's and powerbands, but hope to get an adjustable kb (upto 40kg) in the coming months. Sorry, don't mean to highjack the blog.

Cheers,

Alex

Anonymous said...

Alex,

It's all relative. what is heavy for me may be light for you and on a given day for the same individual that perception may change. It's all about staged and progressive challenges to the body & rest to let it make the adaptations. Trial and error will facilitate your selection of starting protocol -- that and a bit of judicious reading on the net (skipping the patent BS). For heavy day I like to use low reps/multiple sets. Perhaps hook your power bands up to the giri and do presses, push presses, jerks, etc. I like Jump Stretch Power Jumper and Vertical Jumpers - you hook them up to yourself and they provide additional resistance. for light day pick a time to do one or at the most two movements and go for it. If X minutes at X tempo is off for you either boost or reduce the pace or the time until its just about right and stay with that for a couple of months trying each workout to go a little longer or faster. It's a lot of fun to see your previous limits become just that.

David

Smet said...

Guys, thanks for the discussion. I don't mind the "hijacking" of the blog, the more info sharing happens here the better.

I forgot to mention, Verhoshansky recommends two cycles (each consisting of three blocks) in a year. That implies working with professionals who train a lot. In the case of us mere mortals I think one can plan blocks according to the number of sessions. Say, 20 sessions each block. I must be long enough to have an effect of course.

Paul , Marguerite , Alex, Luke 'n' James said...

Certainly as one progresses in GS training one realises the only way to maintain progress and in particular enthusiasm is by adhering to the block approach. Unless of course , one is a professional athlete.

I am stuck at the intermediate level but over time will find new ways to break through plateaus. I suspect it is no more than being patient and applying consistent effort over the medium to long term.

Many speak about losing hard won GS gains rapidly - that's simply a matter of not enough volume base. Short term gains are easy to achieve.

Good stuff!